Talk:Atlantica Party

Politics: Political parties / Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Nova Scotia / New Brunswick / Prince Edward Island / Newfoundland & Labrador / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Brunswick.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Prince Edward Island.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Newfoundland and Labrador.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Article

"A party that purports to discard the old ideological silos of blue, red, orange and green in favour of a multi-hued grassland where every citizen votes his or her own conscience without fear of marginalization, party politics or government manipulation."

This is somewhat metaphorical and not neutral language. If it's a quote from some party document, it should be attributed to wherever this language came from.

The rest seems fine, and it certainly does cite an authoritative source, that being the party itself. So what is the source issue? Yes, a neutral journalists' opinion of where the Atlantica Party's platform differed from that of most other Atlantic Canadian parties would be useful. But, if there's no controversy raised with the current list, having what's there is better than nothing. Presumably in an election, any opponents of the party could and should point out any other attributes of the party's platform that it considers suspect or undesirable, so if this isn't attracting controversy, it's probably accurate.

Just slipping by on the assessment. Looks better than the comment page suggests, though not really a ton of info. Probably could pull off the reliable sources infobox assuming it checks out. (Also, don't forget to sign your comments with four tildas, you anonymous people you...) - Wmcduff (talk) 13:47, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]